Full CV (in German)

Full CV (in English)

since 10/10 Research Associate (Akademischer Rat a.Z.), Department of Psychology III, University of Würzburg.

8/10 Ph.D. Psychology (Dortmund University of Technology)

4/05 - 6/08 "Diplom" Psychology (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle- Wittenberg, Germany)

8/06 - 5/07 Graduate School "Experimental Psychology (University of Nevada at Reno; Reno, NV, USA; Fulbright Scholarship)

10/03 - 3/05 "Vordiplom" Psychologie (Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany)

4/99 - 3/03 "1. Staatsexamen" (Teaching Degree) Lehramt an Sonderschulen (University of Education at Heidelberg, Germany)

(book): 

Janczyk, M., & Pfister, R. (2013). Inferenzstatistik verstehen. Von A wie Signifikanztest bis Z wie Konfidenzintervall. [Understanding inferential statistics. From A as in significance test to Z as in confidence interval]. Heidelberg: Springer.

Web: www.springer.com/springer+vs/psychologie/book/978-3-642-34824-2

Note. The PDFs below are for your personal scholary use only, and not for reproduction, distribution, or commercial use.

(peer reviewed):

Janczyk, M. (in press). Level-2 perspective taking entails two processes: Evidence from PRP experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

Pfister, R. & Janczyk, M. (in press). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology.

Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (in press). Editorial: Action effects in perception and action. Frontiers in Cognition. pdf.

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K.A., Carson, R., & Janczyk, M. (in press). Easy methods for extracting individual regression slopes: Comparing SPSS, R, and Excel. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology.

Janczyk, M., Heinemann, A., & Pfister, R. (2012). Instant attraction: Immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulus- and goal-driven actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 446.

Janczyk, M. & Kunde, W. (2012). Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 19, 412-417. DOI 10.3758/s13423-012-0238-6

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Crognale, M., & Kunde, W. (2012). Effective rotations: Action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 489-501.

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R. & Kunde, W. (2012). On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. Journal of Psychology, 220, 16-22.

Janczyk, M. & Wühr, P. (2012). Inhibition does not always cause emotional devaluation: No evidence for retrieval-induced devaluation. Experimental Psychology, 59, 372-378.

Kunde, W., Pfister, R. & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 703-714.

Pfister, R., Heinemann, A., Kiesel, A., Thomaschke, R., Janczyk, M. (2012). Do endogenous and exogenous action control compete for perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 279-284.

Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Harleß' Apparatus of Will: 150 years later. Psychological Research, 76, 561-565. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0362-3.

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K.A., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Ubi irritatio, ibi affluxus: A 19th century perspective on haemodynamic brain activity. Cortex, 48, 1061-1063.

Wienrich, C. & Janczyk, M. (2011). Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible - A failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton-target search task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 2044-2052.

Janczyk, M. & Grabowski, J. (2011). The focus of attention in working memory: Evidence from a word updating task. Memory, 19, 211-225.

Janczyk, M., Franz, V.H. & Kunde, W. (2010). Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing? Neuropsychologia, 48, 3405-3415.

Janczyk, M. & Kunde, W. (2010). Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 89-100.

Janczyk, M. & Kunde, W. (2010). Stimulus-response bindings contribute to item switch costs in working memory. Psychological Research, 74, 370-377.

Heuer, H., Janczyk, M. & Kunde, W. (2010). Random noun generation in younger and older adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 465-478.

Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2010). Los, beweg dich! - Aber wie? Ideen zur Steuerung menschlicher Handlungen. In-Mind Magazine, 4. Available online.

Janczyk, M., Skirde, S., Weigelt, M. & Kunde, W. (2009). Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Human Movement Science, 28, 437-449.

Janczyk, M., Wienrich , C. & Kunde, W. (2008). On the costs of refocusing items in working memory: A matter of inhibition or decay? Memory, 16 (4), 374-385.

Janczyk, M., Schöler, H. & Grabowski, J. (2004). Arbeitsgedächtnis und Aufmerksamkeit bei Vorschulkindern mit gestörter und unauffälliger Sprachentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36 (4), 200-206.

(others):

Janczyk, M. (2004). Rezension: "Kontextoptimierung" von H.-J. Motsch. Heilpädagogik-online (www.heilpaedagogik-online.com), 4, 75-79.

Janczyk, M., Schöler, H. & Grabowski, J. (2003). Arbeitsgedächtnis und Aufmerksamkeit bei sprachentwicklungsgestörten und sprachunauffälligen Vorschulkindern. Arbeitsbericht Nr. 15 aus dem Forschungsprojekt "Differenzialdiagnostik". Heidelberg: Pädagogische Hochschule, Institut für Sonderpädagogik.

The European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs)